Skip to main content

Erasing the blocks!

There is a real story that goes something like this.

There was a coding hackathon at a technology company. Two groups of participants were on two distinct objectives.

The first group had the task of building one finished product that was well designed for end users.

The other group had the task of producing as many conceptual prototypes as possible within the stipulated time. For them, quality was not a requirement.

The hackathon ran for 48 hours straight. The first group was to produce a finished product but struggled to define what the finished version meant and spent precious time getting their team to agree on it. They ended up with a half-baked code at the showcase.

The other team, however, delivered spectacular results. Not only did they have several working prototypes but also end purposes were defined clearly for each. They also worked to improve the quality as the event progressed!

The learning from this story is that the boundaries we set define the reality of performance. The first group found their environment constraining and had unclear expectations to deliver. The second group found that they had the freedom to experiment and create openly without pressure. The team rallied to produce better and more usable output.

How we define constraints defines the actions that ensue. The creation is the result of what transpires through those actions. 

The rule of thumb is to use stricter constraints to reduce the downsides of a predictable project with relative certainty. Or use flexible ones to encourage risk-taking and experimentation until there are viable results.

It all boils down to diligently traversing the decision paths to a second degree. Well laid out constraints take into account the ramifications of deploying them.

The proof of how we did on that count is to see if the effort ended in hopeless disappointment or proud jubilation.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Checks and balances!

Defining a good purpose, setting a target goal and getting people working on them is usually not enough! There are too many aspects involved in getting the results we want. For example, there is an aspect of painting the big picture, working on motivation management, productivity tracking, building experimentation labs, and erecting resilient systems that systematize the workflows. Just putting bodies to work and defining milestones rarely achieves the right results. The other aspects that help march towards the milestones in an orderly manner, they are equally important. At the very least, they make objectives widely understandable and results more attainable. The job of a thought leader is to enable progress and enable recovery. Therefore, it is never enough to have just ideas. Those with ideas also have the responsibility to assemble the work environment in such a way as to create situations containing the energy disperses. Energy dispersal from lack of clarity, loss of motivation, ...

Choking the communication channel.

There are instances where everything looks in order. Structures are rightly in place. Right roles are defined. Responsibilities are distributed. Bi-directional open communication is expected to take place. And with that, collective work is expected to turn out productive. Yet, when the action begins, everything breaks apart. Productivity dwindles, cooperation is missing, and ad-hoc interactions are common-place That creates chaos. No one appears in charge even though there is someone responsible. It clearly is a sign of broken communication channels. A well-orchestrated workplace focuses on methods to communicate grounds-up and top-down. It encourages patient listening, internalizing and responding rather than reacting. All effective open communication channels are a result of making such communication possible. Often, the structures are set such that you centralize communication of every bit of your activity to someone in the hierarchy. Over time it turns into a permission-based inter...

Unentangle.

Some circumstances warrant protecting your time and effort. Saying no to everything and ruthlessly keeping space becomes your priority. Space that can hold the opportunity to take something that excites you. There are distractions thrown your way. Carrots are dangling in front of you, making you believe that a brighter future lies in following a defined path. They are others' views of the opportunities, not yours. When you are picky about what you want to do - the right way to go is to say no until you can say whole body yes to something that ignites you. Eventually, what you do may work or not. But you made your choice. Some other circumstances warrant a mechanism for creating opportunities. You ought to find ways to use your time and effort to do something worthwhile. Say yes to what comes your way, and keeping up with exploration provides experience. Experience in what among many options to pick from. By knowing what those options involve. When you are open about what you want t...